After first popping up in a Japanese woman’s ear in 2009, Candida auris, a type of yeast, has since become a global health threat, particularly for those with compromised immune systems. Genetically distinct versions of the fungus have sprung up simultaneously in India, South Africa and South America, perplexing researchers in the process.
This bug is resistant to antifungal medication and can easily spread between patients, causing outbreaks in a relatively short amount of time. The fungus can cause infections in the bloodstream, heart and brain, with preliminary studies suggesting a mortality rate of between 30 and 60 percent.
The researchers explain that fungal infections in humans –and mammals more broadly– are rare, given our advanced immune systems and higher body temperatures, which preclude most malicious fungi from causing us any harm. However, as average global temperatures have risen, (they claim) C. auris has been able to adapt to warmer environments, providing it with a whole new breeding ground in the human population. Really?
Since its discovery a decade ago there have been 715 cases of C. auris infection in the US alone. Despite warnings it has spread to more than 30 countries, and quite possibly far more, given how hard it is to identify without specialized laboratory testing equipment. Yet USA has been experiencing record cold temperatures during the current solar minimum.
“You gotta try to think, what could be the unifying cause here? These are different societies, different populations,” Arturo Casadevall, one of the authors of the new study, explained. “But the one thing they have in common is that the world is getting warmer.”
Let us look at global temperatures WITHOUT politics:
This chart above shows global temperatures, but note the subjective, non scientific, political scale on the bottom. “Near Average” What does that even mean?
Now let us take a look at the same chart WITHOUT the subjective politics and with a scientific scale:
Suddenly all the blues appear… and guess which chart all the mainstream news networks show you? Yes, the political one.
So are the Southern Oceans warming then? Twenty One years of NASA satellite data says that the Southern Oceans, where these infections have simultaneously cropped up, are not only cooling, but getting greener!
The Southern Oceans are getting greener and cooler because the amount of marine plants (phytoplankton) has been increasing in the last 21 years. These changes appear to be happening faster during the winter, which suggests that the growing season is getting longer. This is important because the Southern Ocean has a big role in the biology and chemistry of the oceans, and in regulating the Earth’s climate. This work was done using 21 years of data from two NASA satellites, coinciding with Al Gore’s now infamous predictions of doom and gloom from global warming.
The concentration of chlorophyll is also an indicator for the amount of photosynthetic plankton, or phytoplankton, present in the ocean. Phytoplankton populations are influenced by climatic factors such as sea surface temperatures and winds.
At the base of the ocean food web are single-celled algae and other plant-like organisms known as phytoplankton. Like plants on land, phytoplankton use chlorophyll and other light-harvesting pigments to carry out photosynthesis. Where phytoplankton grow depends on available sunlight, temperature, and nutrient levels. Because cold waters tend to have more nutrients than warm waters, phytoplankton tend to be more plentiful where waters are cooler, therefore more chlorophyll is an indicator that the Oceans are cooling, NOT warming.
Phytoplankton are microscopic, floating, plant-like organisms that live in oceans, lakes, and rivers. Phytoplankton form the base of the marine food web, converting solar energy into organic matter (primary production). This process ultimately feeds the world’s fish, sea birds, marine mammals, and humans. Because phytoplankton use photosynthetic pigments like chlorophyll to convert solar energy into organic matter, the amount of phytoplankton present in the ocean can be assessed by measuring chlorophyll concentrations. When phytoplankton populations are large, the color of the water appears greener because of high concentrations of chlorophyll.
Phytoplankton populations, as indicated by chlorophyll concentrations, respond to both seasonal (short-term) and climatic (long-term) changes. Primary production by phytoplankton can be affected indirectly by climatic factors, such as changes in water temperatures and surface winds, which affect mixing within the water column and the availability of nutrients . Changes in cloud cover, which can reduce or increase solar energy available for photosynthesis, can also affect primary production.
The chlorophyll concentration data shown here were obtained from global satellite measurements by the SeaWiFS and MODIS-Aqua projects of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Satellite data collection allows for large spatial coverage and frequent measurements over time, which is useful for assessing long-term changes. One limitation, however, is that satellites can only measure near-surface chlorophyll concentrations, thus potentially underestimating the total amount of phytoplankton present at all water depths. Chlorophyll concentrations also do not provide information on the composition of phytoplankton communities (for example, the abundance of larger versus smaller species).
According to NASA, the chlorophyll maps show milligrams of chlorophyll per cubic meter of seawater each month. Places where chlorophyll amounts were very low, indicating very low numbers of phytoplankton are blue. Places where chlorophyll concentrations were high, meaning many phytoplankton were growing, are dark green. The observations come from the MODIS sensor on NASA’s Aqua satellite. Land is dark gray, and places where MODIS could not collect data (reasons include sea ice, polar darkness, or clouds) are light gray.
These sea surface temperature maps are based on observations by the MODIS sensors on NASA’s Terra and Aqua satellites. The satellites measure the temperature of the top millimeter of the ocean surface. In this map, the coolest waters appear in blue (approximately -2 degrees Celsius), and the warmest temperatures appear in pink-yellow (35 degrees Celsius). Landmasses and the large area of sea ice around Antarctica appear in shades of gray, indicating no data were collected.
The highest chlorophyll concentrations, where tiny surface-dwelling ocean plants are thriving, are in cold polar waters or in places where ocean currents bring cold water to the surface, such as around the equator and along the shores of continents. The polar – equator difference intensifies in the hemisphere experiencing summer. For example, the difference in chlorophyll concentration between the Southern Ocean and equatorial ocean areas is bigger in December than September. In polar waters, nutrients accumulate in surface waters during the dark winter months when plants can’t grow. When sunlight returns in the spring and summer, the plants flourish in high concentrations.
Also, when surface waters are cold, it is easier for deeper water to rise to the surface, bringing nutrients to sunlit areas where phytoplankton can use them. When surface water is warm, cooler, nutrient-rich water is trapped below. Because the vertical layers of the ocean aren’t mixing, nutrients that have built up in deep waters can’t reach the surface. In places where ocean currents cause upwelling, sea surface temperatures are often cooler than nearby waters, and chlorophyll concentrations are higher. This connection is evident in multiple places. A band of cool, plant-rich waters circles the globe at the Equator, with the strongest signal in the Atlantic Ocean and the open waters of the Pacific Ocean. In many coastal areas, the rising slope of the sea floor pushes cold water from the lowest layers of the ocean to the surface. The rising, or upwelling water carries iron and other nutrients from the ocean floor. Cold coastal upwelling and subsequent phytoplankton growth are most evident along the west coasts of North and South America and southern Africa.
The researchers did caution, however, that climate change alone cannot explain the sudden emergence of such a lethal yeast and were careful to add other possible factors, such as the proliferation of antifungal medication use and the widespread use of fungicides on crops. But did not include that in their headline…